It
was announced yesterday by NHS England, Wednesday 22 October 2014, that GPs
will receive a payment of £55 for each patient that they diagnose with
dementia. To say the least, this proposal has prompted a good deal of debate. It
has its supporters and its detractors.
The
statistics on dementia are stark. The following are provided by the Alzheimer’s
Society:
- By 2015 there will be 850,000 people with dementia in the UK.
- There are 40,000 younger people with dementia in the UK.
- There are 25,000 people with dementia from black and minority
ethnic groups in the UK.
- There will be 1 million people with dementia in the UK by 2025.
- Two thirds of people with dementia are women.
- The proportion of people with dementia doubles for every five-year
age group.
- One in six people aged 80 and over have dementia.
- 60,000 deaths a year are directly attributable to dementia.
- Delaying the onset of dementia by five years would reduce deaths
directly attributable to dementia by 30,000 a year.
- The financial cost of dementia to the UK is £26 billion per annum.
- There are 670,000 carers of people with dementia in the UK.
- Family carers of people with dementia save the UK £11 billion a
year.
- 80 per cent of people living in care homes have a form of dementia
or severe memory problems.
- Two thirds of people with dementia live in the community while one third live in a care home.
The NHS England initiative is motivated in no small part by the further
statistic that estimates that less than half of people in the UK who have
dementia receive a diagnosis. That’s something like 400 000 people who have
dementia but have not been diagnosed.
Let’s have a look at the arguments for and against GPs receiving
payments for dementia diagnoses.
The Case for
Payments Being Made
1.
It is nothing short of a
scandal that less than half of those with dementia receive a formal diagnosis.
This is the view of Jeremy Hughes, the Chief Executive of the Alzheimer’s
Society.
2.
Incentives for GPs work, something
that has repeatedly been demonstrated since the introduction of new contracts
in 2004.
3.
Doing nothing is not an
option. Too many people without a diagnosis are left without the support they
badly need.
4.
The payment is not just a
payment for a diagnosis. GPs will need to have a plan and show improving rates
of diagnosis.
5.
Patients who receive a
diagnosis are in a position to access treatment and plan their lives.
6.
Improved diagnosis rates may
lead to improved research into dementia treatments.
The Case
against Payments Being Made
1.
A payment for a diagnosis is a
“bounty on the heads” of certain patients. This is the view of Katherine
Murphy, the Chief Executive of the Patients Association.
2.
Good GPs already diagnose
dementia without an added incentive.
3.
Do GPs fail to diagnose not
because they can’t diagnose dementia but because:
a.
Each diagnosis is a cost to
the practice
b.
Each diagnosis adds to GPs
workload
c.
GPs fatalistically believe
that a diagnosis leads to nothing being done
Each of the
above is unethical and should not lead to GPs being rewarded to change their
practice.
4.
Money is needed not so much
for diagnosis, which doctors are able to do, but for treatment and support following
diagnosis.
5. Any money available would be better spent on research to improve the
treatment and care of patients.
6. If it is the case that GPs cannot diagnose dementia because they lack
the diagnostic skills, the payment will do nothing to improve their skills.
7.
Incentive payments to make a
diagnosis may lead to GPs erring on the side of a diagnosis.
Conclusion
I do not for a moment suggest that the above points, for and against,
represent the arguments to exhaustion. They are, though, some of the main points
that are put forward but each of the sides in this debate.
On which side do you fall?
No comments:
Post a Comment